Quantcast The Daily Gamecock
College Media Network

The Daily Gamecock

University of South Carolina Since 1908

Scriptures silent on economics

Jesus called for personal responsibility rather than government-based fixes

Paul Bowers

Issue date: 11/10/08 Section: Viewpoints
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
Paul Bowers<br><i>Second-year print journalism student</i>
Paul Bowers
Second-year print journalism student

Socialism, some have said, is knocking at the door of the U.S. True? Perhaps. Frightening? Sure.

As is often the case with looming specters of change, we have seen the intersection of faith and politics take the spotlight. Here in the South, it would seem that socialism is an atheist doctrine while capitalism is Christian.

Elsewhere, much the opposite is deemed true. In a Washington Post opinion column published Friday, theologian Anthony Stevens-Arroyo argues, "Socialism is not a dirty word to Catholics."

What, after all, does the leading religion in America have to say about the way governments function and the way economies are structured?

Very little, actually.

One Biblical passage that many pundits are fond of quoting - and which Stevens-Arroyo references in his column - is in the second chapter of Acts, where Luke writes, "All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need."

Clearly, some would say, this is a Christian call to socialism. But these same people tend to gloss over Acts 4:32, which reads, "All the believers were one in heart and mind."

The first-century church may very well have been socialist - even communist. But difficulty arises when we try to extrapolate from a small, like-minded community to a large, ideologically diverse nation.

This system obviously worked well for the early Christians, and similar communities exist even today in the U.S. But to make the jump from congregation to Congress requires a willing ignorance of the difference between a church and a country.

The opposite view - that socialism is anti-Christian and the free market is Biblically supported - is not without precedent, either.

Throughout the Old Testament books of the Law, property rights are crucial. Moses delivered hundreds of commandments concerning inheritance and the ownership of land and livestock. One of the well-known Ten, after all, is "You shall not steal."

So if a government is to rule morally, shouldn't the preservation of property rights be central to its functioning? Certainly it's an important concern, but on the other hand, we see God commanding Israel in Deuteronomy 15 to take care of its poor and to cancel all debts every seven years. Looking back from the perspective of eternity, I imagine we will regard personal property with utter flippancy.

What, then, should Christians in America do with the politico-economic machinery we have inherited?

If we are to follow the example of Christ, the formula is simple: Obey the just laws, pay your taxes to Caesar and labor to serve others.

Both socialism and capitalism miss the mark on that third point. In socialism, the responsibility of servanthood is relegated to the state, whereas in capitalism we are taught to serve ourselves.

Christians should of course seek to put and keep morally justified administrations in power.

But if this world is to be improved, I guarantee it will not be at the hands of any government. The answer to the world's struggles is, and has always been, personal action.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 22

Steve

posted 11/10/08 @ 2:47 AM EST

This is without a doubt the dumbest article I've ever read.

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

jesus

posted 11/10/08 @ 7:37 AM EST

Yes, lets look at the old bible for inspiration:

Exodus 21:20-21
And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished. (Continued…)

w

posted 11/10/08 @ 1:19 PM EST

This is a pretty dumb article, but it raises another point.

So many people think that anything socialist in nature is bad, because for the large part people are uneducated and think that socialism = communism, which it does not (just as democracy does not equal capitalism). (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Vic Ariel

posted 11/10/08 @ 6:55 PM EST

As a USC alumni with a degree in economics I'm terrified by this writer's views. Even Bush didn't have economists on his staff with flat-earth views like this. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Tanner S

posted 11/10/08 @ 7:45 PM EST

So, correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like you're saying that the collective wisdom of bronze-age goat herders are of limited applicability in a 21st century macroeconomic context?

Shocking. (Continued…)

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

David

posted 11/10/08 @ 7:58 PM EST

So you write that the Bible doesn't advocate ardent capitalism nor government-run socialism and somehow this offends people? Way to stir things up! Those of us who worry about the direction that this country has chosen thank you for the perspective. (Continued…)

PMitch

posted 11/11/08 @ 11:35 AM EST

1. this is a well-written, thought out, logically-flowing article that is grounded both in biblical comprehension and an ability to look at the church objectively as well as the nation. (Continued…)

CHUCK

posted 11/11/08 @ 4:57 PM EST

In response to "w", I am absolutely humbled that you, the wisest man in the universe have pointed out that in "large part" us poor uneducated people are so dumb. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Bri

posted 11/12/08 @ 2:28 AM EST

Seriously, give the kid a break. This is, after all, posted in the Viewpoints section. And, while this paper is terribly overwrought with people's "Viewpoints," (as opposed to actual news), no one is being misled here - that is simply the topic of another post all together. (Continued…)

CHUCK

posted 11/12/08 @ 10:52 AM EST

To BTAC: I seriously doubt that 4-6 weeks of vaction will keep employees "psychologically refreshed", just cause a massive lost of productivity which we can ill afford. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

What do you think about the 'missing' Sanford?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement