Anti-smoker jihad tactics prove useless
Loud criticisms, comments make already annoying situations more awkward
Paul Bowers
Issue date: 3/24/08 Section: Viewpoints
|
And then there are the people whose annoying habit is smoking tobacco products. I myself do not smoke, but I am amazed by the stigma our society has built around the practice. Somehow, we have allowed an admittedly gross but relatively minor offense to become a damnable act.
Yes, the smoke stinks a little bit. Yes, it can make you cough if you walk through a cloud of it. But far more irritating than the smokers among us are the people who make a scene every time they see a stranger lighting up.
I have witnessed multiple confrontations that were sparked by a mere Marlboro. It's a familiar scene: The smoker is minding his own business, sucking down his cancer stick of choice, when a group of adamant non-smokers ride by on their high horses and proffer such helpful comments as "Put that thing out, man" or "That's just gross" or "You know that's gonna kill you one day." If the smoker is in a bad mood or has already heard from their ilk that day, he typically responds with a strategically directed plume.
There is no sense in being nasty toward perfect strangers. You don't rip into somebody for not brushing his teeth. You don't launch into a diatribe against someone on the sidewalk for walking his yippy dogs too close to your legs. So why is it acceptable to jump down someone's throat for taking a few puffs in your vicinity?
Many local governments, anxious to cast stones, have joined in the contrived anti-smoker holy war, banning smoking in every public area from parks to - of all places - bars. At USC, policy prohibits smoking within 25 feet of any on-campus building.
I can understand a ban on indoor smoking on campus - the secondhand effects of carcinogenic fumigation would present a genuine health hazard - but how difficult is it to simply sidestep outdoor areas where smokers have congregated or to hold your breath for a few seconds as you pass through?
It is reasonable to assume that all smokers in the United States know the risk they are taking. If they do not know the long-term effects of their actions, then they are either cloistered in a cave or selectively tuning the information out, so constant reminders can do no good.
If the smoker in question is a friend of yours, then it is an entirely different case. Of course you should encourage the people you love to live healthy lives, and the university offers many allegedly successful smoking cessation programs to this end.
But when it comes to chance meetings with perfect strangers, all you're doing is burning a bridge to someone who could prove to be an otherwise decent person. Sure, a smoker is momentarily irksome, but few people are more annoying than an outspoken jerk.
Spring Break

Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 13
Mark
posted 3/24/08 @ 12:55 AM EST
Absolutely right, except that even here too much credibility is given to the alleged dangers of second hand smoke. Anyone who looks into the issue objectively and thoroughly discovers that the health risks of environmental tobacco smoke have been wildly overstated through a carefully crafted propaganda campaign, for years, made up of junk science, deliberately misinterpreted or ignored accurate science, and ever increasing tactics of hate, demonization, and hysteria against smokers themselves. (Continued…)
Watts
posted 3/24/08 @ 10:37 AM EST
As a former two packs a day smoker and a friend of many smokers, I can more than understand where you are coming from. However, as a tax payer and a believer in public health, I have to say that no smoking rules are not just about trying to stop a minor annoying offense. (Continued…)
Sam Bennett
posted 3/25/08 @ 12:10 AM EST
Dude you are an idiot. As a tuition paying student at this university I think I have the right to breathe clean air at least 5 times in a row. I cannot tell you how many times I am walking on campus and decide "hey it's time to breathe now" but to my suprise I enhale a gulp of cancer air. (Continued…)
Mark
posted 3/25/08 @ 5:19 AM EST
If you are going to consider yourself anything like informed on any issue you have to consider arguments and evidence from more than one side, so, yes, I can suggest one or two places to start (among many) that challenge the party line on second hand smoke. (Continued…)
Tanner S
posted 3/25/08 @ 10:54 AM EST
C'mon. . . Jihad? Seriously? Any legitimate criticism you may have flies right out the window when you start throwing around words like that. Are anti-smoking activists walking into crowds of smokers and blowing themselves up? Are people issuing fatwas against the Marlboro Man? Throwing around words like that do nothing to make your point. (Continued…)
Mark
posted 3/28/08 @ 6:00 AM EST
Attacking a blog or a website simply because it is a blog or a website is meaningless. If you're going to argue against them it has to be based on their content. (Continued…)
Annie
posted 3/28/08 @ 10:38 PM EST
So, you really don't understand why non-smokers find smokers so offensive?
For starters it is because they are inconsiderate, they force their nasty habit on everyone in the vicinity of their deadly smoke. (Continued…)
astute observer
posted 3/31/08 @ 3:50 PM EST
it's funny how quick people are to criticize and slam smokers yet they're very quick to defend drunken morons who jump on moving trains.
Post a Comment