Obama's plans could worsen deficit
Candidate's proposals may cost country more than we bargained for
Seth Duncan
Issue date: 2/15/08 Section: Viewpoints
|
At first glance some would suggest that I am attempting to play to conservatives' fears or trying to make some sort of right-wing hay out of Sen. Obama's middle name. Rather, I am just stating his name as it would be recorded if he were to become president. After all, historians, political commentators and others often cite presidents using their full formal names such as William Jefferson Clinton, George Walker Bush and others. Some may want to make or take political cheap shots with his middle name, but that is not the purpose of this article.
The real purpose of this article is to examine what a President Obama may look like.
As we see with all candidates for the Oval Office, many promises have been made on the campaign trail, along with sentimental fluff and to a lesser extent, substantive policy initiatives.
For starters, Obama just recently unveiled his economic plan, which he hopes to enact when he takes the reins from Bush. He is full of great ideas like universal health care, more tax cuts for the middle class and an additional $150 billion worth of economic stimulus aimed at the "green energy sector," according to report published on Bloomberg.com.
Additionally, Obama wants to invest $60 billion in national infrastructure projects on top of doling out more loans and other financial assistance for higher education. All of these plans sound great, but as Rod Tidwell (Cuba Gooding, Jr. in the movie "Jerry Maguire") said, "SHOW ME THE MONEY!"
At a time when this nation is spending more money than it can print, an Obama presidency may be far too expensive. Democratic operatives, supporting Obama, are chatting up the airwaves trying to convince the nation that with the repeal of the Bush tax cuts and with the ending of combat and non-combat operations in Iraq, we can afford all of these and other programs. However, they may be fudging the numbers.
It has been suggested, by some economic pundits, that if a President Obama was able to repeal the tax cuts, the generated revenue would add up to around $100 billion. This leaves a substantial gap still to be filled.
Some argue that a savings will occur with the ending of the war in Iraq, but they are wrong. The money we are spending in Iraq is borrowed money, not money the Treasury Department has accrued through normal revenue streams. Thus, by eliminating Iraq spending and replacing it with other discretionary spending we save a total of $0 if we break even, which I don't think would happen.
Balancing the budget and returning to surpluses should be the top priority of the next president, but with a President Obama we might just see a continuation of out-of-control spending.
Spring Break

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 46
JCha
posted 2/15/08 @ 3:10 AM EST
Why is this in the NEWS section? This has Viewpoints Section reeking all over it. Sad.
Tom Harris
posted 2/15/08 @ 3:26 AM EST
Yes, Obama may be quite frightening. However, Clinton and McCain are just as crazy about spending billions trying to "stop climate change", a ridiculous and impossible objective. (Continued…)
carolina88
posted 2/15/08 @ 4:04 AM EST
I'm hoping desperately that you're not a graduate student in the school of journalism. Have you considered presenting facts that are bound by some sort of cohesive element, like, perhaps, logical reasoning?
Faithful Gamecock
posted 2/15/08 @ 7:23 AM EST
Oh my dear, what in the world is wrong with the Daily Gamecock? This is a viewpoint...and starting off with Sen. Obama's full name...I'm a republican and I don't think you should have done that. (Continued…)
VIEWPOINT IN EMAIL
posted 2/15/08 @ 7:28 AM EST
For the record (to anyone confused), this article IS showing up in the "NEWS" section of some of the "daily email subscribers," even though it is a viewpoint in the ACTUAL Daily Gamecock. (Continued…)
GIVE ME A BREAK
posted 2/15/08 @ 8:10 AM EST
EXPENSIVE PRESIDENCY??
HOW ABOUT A RI-DONK-U-LOUS 2 TRILLION DOLLAR WAR THAT HAS NO MERIT???????????????????????????????????????????????????????
I personally would much rather have Obama rebuilding my townhall then McCain building a permanent base in Iraq. (Continued…)
bob
posted 2/15/08 @ 8:42 AM EST
Now that I know that war spending doesn't matter that much I hope McCain gets elected so we can stay in Iraq for 100 years.
Christine Maccarella
posted 2/15/08 @ 8:48 AM EST
As others have noted, sending this out as "News" reflects really poor editorial effort - embarassing. For me, as a parent from the NY area, this article's placement reinforces my fear of old southern mentality. (Continued…)
GoCocks
posted 2/15/08 @ 8:51 AM EST
Preface: Barack Hussien Obama will rack up the debt.
Premise: America isn't ready for someone with a father he met once who gave him a muslim name? or. (Continued…)
LC
posted 2/15/08 @ 9:31 AM EST
Which would you rather have? A president who wants to meet the needs and concerns of the American people or a president who could care less about the US needs but more about making sure the rich getting richer?
The thing about Obama is that I believe he will be accountable finacially for his projects. (Continued…)
Post a Comment