Quantcast The Daily Gamecock
College Media Network

The Daily Gamecock

The University of South Carolina Since 1908

Arms laws made mass attack easy for shooter

Massacre at Virginia Tech could have been stopped with restrictive legislation

Issue date: 4/24/07 Section: Viewpoints
  • Page 1 of 1
Katie Mikos<br><i>First-year print journalism student</i>
Katie Mikos
First-year print journalism student

In light of all that happened at Virginia Tech, I can't help but dwell on how easy it was for the killer to get a gun. As many of you know, Seung-Hui Cho entered a local gun store just two months before the shootings and purchased his murder weapon. A man with documented mental problems and recorded anti-social behavior was able to choose the gun of his choice, pay for it and walk out the same day with it in his possession.

Now that the tragedy has occurred, we can evaluate the startling evidence and point fingers all we want, but it will not change the damage that has already happened.

For things to be changed, something terrible has to happen to our country. The Sept. 11,2001 attacks had to happen for us to realize that we are not invincible, and just like everyone else, are targets for attack. An angry and deranged student had to go on a killing spree that is officially recorded as the worst gun-related massacre in U.S. history for legislators to stop and think, "Hmm. Maybe we need to pay a little more attention to who we sell deadly weapons to."

According to the Harvard Injury Control Research Center, the number of deaths caused by firearms in the United States is more than in Canada, Japan, Switzerland, Scotland, England and Whales combined. All of these countries have very strict gun laws, and all get along just fine without their citizens having a pistol in their bedside drawer. No one in these countries really needs to worry about having someone hold them at gunpoint, because it hardly ever happens.

In England, the police do not even carry guns - they get by with a nightstick and a heavy flashlight. The guns are just not a necessity.

I understand this may seem a bit extreme to residents of our gun-friendly country. I also realize that the United States is considerably larger than these countries, but regardless, the fact still remains that the people in these countries function just fine without guns.

The fact also remains that if we had stricter laws regarding firearms, Seung-Hui Cho would not have been able to commit the violent crime that cost America the lives of 32 bright and upcoming individuals; people who were somebody's brother, sister, fiancée and best friend.

Who knows what this man may have done differently if he had not had access to a gun. He may still have killed, but the thought of him killing that many people that quickly would have been virtually impossible.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 10

Matt Nevala

posted 4/24/07 @ 12:46 AM EST

Zero tolerance, huh? Gun-free zones, huh? Try this on for size: Columbine gun-free zone, New York City pizza shop gun-free zone, Luby's Cafeteria gun-free zone, Amish school in Pennsylvania gun-free zone and now Virginia Tech gun-free zone. (Continued…)

AJ

posted 4/24/07 @ 8:30 AM EST

I hate it when people who have never actually touched a firearm believe their thoughts on them are worth hearing. Arms are the mark of free men; Stalin, Pol Pot, Hitler, Mao, and all the other gun-grabbing tyrants of the 20th Century surely would have agreed with your appeal to emotion to disarm the citizenry. (Continued…)

Amber

posted 4/24/07 @ 9:20 AM EST

www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55288

Most people thought it would never work, but 25 years without murder in "gun town USA" speaks volumes. (Continued…)

Jarrett Calder

posted 4/24/07 @ 10:16 AM EST

I find it funny that people with supposedly "progressive" beliefs want to do away with the people's last defense against tyranny, both from the state and from other individuals. (Continued…)

Marcia Cross

posted 4/24/07 @ 11:05 AM EST

Actually, you need to remove Switzerland from your list of c=Countries with strict gun laws. Switzerland has more than 2 million guns for a population of about 5 million. (Continued…)

Mary

posted 4/24/07 @ 1:32 PM EST

In situations like these, it's alot easier to look at the "how" instead of the why. However, if you look at the why, there's a common thread. Many of the HS shootings, including and since Columbine, have all come from kids who felt detatched, unliked, and like an outsider. (Continued…)

Bob Jackman

posted 4/24/07 @ 5:26 PM EST

Washington D.C. has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. Oh by the way it is also the murder capital of the United States. Do you even do research before you open your bimbo mouth?

Kev

posted 4/24/07 @ 6:07 PM EST

Did you know there is a federal law that should have kept him from buying a gun but since Virgina did not consider him to have behavorial problems he was allowed to purchase the gun. (Continued…)

Steve Beardman

posted 4/24/07 @ 6:28 PM EST

The whole "to gun or not to gun" issue aside, Virginia law in place allowed Cho to buy guns even though his mental problems had been determined by a judge. (Continued…)

Terrence Corcoran

posted 4/24/07 @ 6:42 PM EST

May I suggest a viewing of the movie "Hotel Rwanda"? This is what happens when the civilian population is disarmed by their government--the hooligan factor takes over. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

How do you feel about giving blood?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement